This building is a lot more famous than it looks
Monchi, for example, grew up in Jarmen, a town with a population of 3,000: “We didn’t even have a youth center, just a bus stop.” Everything was mixed up in youth. The doctors were heard as well as Nazi music.
At some point they decided to position themselves against the right. The answer was, for example, a butyric acid attack on the rehearsal room and open hostility. “There was always a threat, but you get used to it,” says Christoph. You yourself would have the public and a good network. It is about supporting small projects and “individual people among all the agitators” who would be pretty much alone with their commitment – a barbecue or a football tournament with refugees would be enough.
Especially in the country there is a “crass Nazi infrastructure”. And yet: The love for home and the bond with friends and family is enormous. FSF still play in small towns. They could have organized their release parties in Hamburg or Berlin long ago, but they consciously choose villages in the region. In Jarmen they organize an open air every year together with the fire brigade and football club. Because: “There are a lot of horny people here too.”
“We always say: Don’t stay in shock, get your ass up,” explains guitarist Christoph. Before the state elections in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania in 2016, they are tringing against the shift to the right through the province with their campaign “Not completely in the ass” Monchi sometimes drives relief supplies to the Turkish-Syrian border or visits a completely overcrowded refugee camp on Lesbos. “A visit like this does something to you on so many levels. It sharpens the senses,” he explains. “And when you come home, you are of course extremely grateful for the great happiness you were born here.”
But the band also affirms: “Fine cream isn’t just politics, it’s just part of us.” Anyone attending a concert experiences a passionate and intoxicating evening with sweat and drunkenness, punk and partying. Musically, maybe still expandable. “I still can’t sing and play at Rock am Ring now,” they say. And there are definitely touching moments. For example, when Monchi speaks full of respect about his parents, who were there for him even in difficult times. “I think what you do sucks, but I stand behind you,” he sings. In any case, there are a lot of personal songs “in which we let our pants down”.
In the music scene, FSF have prominent fans. Herbert Grönemeyer supported her in the Dessau debate via Instagram. For rapper Marteria, Monchi is “one of the most exciting figures in pop culture”. And Tote-Hosen singer Campino said of the dpa: “You are a living example of the fact that you can keep your composure, even when you are in a difficult environment and times are getting tougher.”
But the band is still a thorn in the side of many. “We’re not hippies and we don’t all have to like each other. Whoever has a big mouth can be found shit sometimes, no question about it,” says Monchi. He doesn’t gloss over anything from his past. The football fan was active in the ultra scene at Hansa Rostock and was banned from the stadium for five years. He stole his sister and his parents had to pick him up from a cell in Dortmund after an away game. He sings about it in songs today too.
The Office for the Protection of the Constitution accused them of anti-state and anti-police passages in a song from 2009. “The bull helmets, they should fly, you can get your clubs in the face,” it says. Another part of the song is mentioned less often, which says: “They kicked me, they hit me. I just fought and they wanted to sue me for that!” “For me, such songs are not a master’s thesis,” says Monchi today, nine years later. And: It is understandable that you don’t have gentle thoughts when you get a stick in your face.123helpme.me
The youth radio “Puls” from Bayerischer Rundfunk called the FSF “perhaps the most important band in Germany” back in March: There is no other band that is so well-known in Germany that is so open to what they think is right: “namely, their homeland is not the drooling one To leave small minds and agitators “. And: “Every federal state could use a band like Feine Sahne Fischfilet.”
Graz / Brussels (dpa) – The EU transport ministers are discussing today (9:30 a.m.) in Graz, Austria, about the abolition of the half-yearly time change. At the informal meeting, the responsible ministers will discuss the plans for the first time. No decisions are foreseen.
T-Online.de/TV
German nursing home becomes a hit online
Macron reports from quarantine with a video message
MPs reckon with sexism in the Bundestag
This building is way more famous than it looks
Instagram star dies after cosmetic surgery
Elephant cow gives birth – reaction of the herd amazes
US Vice President Pence vaccinated against Corona
NASA mission enables a first look inside Mars
These rules apply to your fireworks in the garden
Spahn asks for patience when distributing the vaccine
Strange beer appearance in the US Parliament
Suddenly there is no stopping the minister
Container use due to Corona causes a stir
Towing service has a bad surprise
Winter weather causes chaos on the US east coast
The EU Commission had proposed to abolish the time change. Instead, states should be able to choose whether they always want winter or summer time in the future. The majority of the EU states and the European Parliament would have to agree to the proposals so that they can be implemented.
In some EU capitals there was still a need for clarification. However, Germany is already tending towards permanent summer time, as is Austria, which currently holds the presidency among the EU states.
The Brussels authority had proposed the change after 84 percent of the participants in an EU-wide online survey had spoken out in favor of abolishing the time change. Most advocated permanent summer time. The EU Commission received 4.6 million responses – a record for this type of survey, but less than one percent of the EU population. 3 million participants came from Germany alone.
Cambrigde (dpa) – Even autonomous vehicles can come into a decision dilemma. How are you supposed to steer before an accident, if there is definitely damage. US researchers have found answers in a worldwide survey.
T-Online.de/TV
Nursing home action causes a stir
Macron reports from quarantine with a video message
Member of the Bundestag expects sexist attacks
Trump casino is blown up – who can push the button?
Permissive Instagram star dies after cosmetic surgery
Elephant cow gives birth – reaction of the herd amazes
US Vice President Pence vaccinated against Corona
NASA mission enables a first look inside Mars
These rules apply to your fireworks in the garden
Spahn asks for patience when distributing the vaccine
Strange beer appearance in the US Parliament
Suddenly there is no stopping the minister
Container use due to Corona causes a stir
Towing service has a bad surprise
Winter weather causes chaos on the US east coast
According to this, a majority would rather spare children than the elderly and avoid people rather than animals. The result, however, shows greater cultural differences, write the researchers led by Iyad Rahwan from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge in the journal “Nature”.
The Internet survey entitled “Moral Machine” made headlines around the world. The large participation made it possible for the researchers to analyze almost 40 million decisions in dilemma situations. However, the survey was not representative; for example, young men were disproportionately represented.
Sauerland: Fatal accident in the sawmill: employee trapped Pandemic in Germany: 31,300 new corona infections reported Disaster in Turkey: Nine corona patients die in a fire in the intensive care unit
Rahwan and colleagues justify their survey with the significance for the acceptance of autonomous vehicles in the population: “Even if the ethicists agreed on how autonomous vehicles should solve moral dilemmas, their work would be useless if the citizens did not agree to their solution.”
In a specific case study, the vehicle’s brakes failed. The respondents had to decide whether three elderly people who cross the street when it is red should be run over or whether the car should be steered against a concrete wall. This would result in the death of the inmates, including a boy.
In total, the participants had to make nine decisions in different situations, including: vehicle occupants or pedestrians, men or women, younger or older, athletes or unsportsmen, people with higher or lower social status.
The analysis by country revealed three large groups: western, eastern and southern clusters. The decisions in many Asian countries (eastern cluster) differ from the other groups in that they would not spare the younger people. Instead, these countries respect the older members of the community.
The southern cluster (Central and South America) differs from the western cluster (Europe, North America), among other things, in that the Central and South Americans would intervene much more often than forego steering.
The results of the “Moral Machine” partially deviate from the rules that the German Ethics Commission laid down in its report “Autonomous and networked driving” in June 2017. Rule 9 says: “In unavoidable accident situations, any qualification based on personal characteristics (age, gender, physical or mental constitution) is strictly prohibited.”
In the same rule, there are three sentences further: “Those involved in the creation of mobility risks must not sacrifice those not involved.” According to the results of the study, a large number of respondents worldwide have different moral ideas.
Basically, she thinks the authors’ goal is correct, to initiate a debate about the “ethical programming” of self-driving cars before they hit the streets, comments Silja Vöneky from the University of Freiburg on the study. “But we shouldn’t believe that we have to reinvent or change all standards and principles just because it involves a new technology.” Dilemma situations had already existed and with human rights there were already legally binding ethical principles.
Armin Grunwald from the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology even warns against the conclusions of the study: “Neither from games nor from surveys can we learn anything about the ethical admissibility of standards Introduction of the death penalty would run out. ” Grunwald was a member of the ethics committee that wrote the report “Autonomous and networked driving”.
Dresden (dpa) – The AfD would like to be perceived by the media in a more differentiated way and complains about a one-sided picture of the reporting.
T-Online.de/TV
Nursing home action causes a stir
Macron reports from quarantine with a video message
Member of the Bundestag expects sexist attacks
Trump casino is blown up – who can push the button?
Permissive Instagram star dies after cosmetic surgery on the bottom
Elephant cow gives birth – reaction of the herd amazes
US Vice President Pence vaccinated against Corona
NASA mission enables a first look inside Mars
These rules apply to your fireworks in the garden
Spahn asks for patience when distributing the vaccine
Strange beer appearance in the US Parliament
Suddenly there is no stopping the minister
Container use due to Corona causes a stir
Towing service has a bad surprise
Winter weather causes chaos on the US east coast
That is the conclusion of a debate in which the editors-in-chief of ARD-aktuell, Kai Gniffke, and ZDF, Peter Frey, presented themselves to AfD supporters in Dresden on Thursday evening. Both also addressed the hostility towards journalists. The Dresden AfD had invited to the event. Occasionally it got loud in the hall.
In addition to Gniffke and Frey, the AfD politician and journalist Nicolaus Fest and Michael Klonovsky, formerly head of the service at the news magazine “Focus”, took part in the panel discussion. Both criticized, among other things, the reporting of the public broadcasters about the latest events in Chemnitz, about US President Donald Trump or New Year’s Eve 2015 in Cologne.
Sauerland: Fatal accident in the sawmill: employee trapped Pandemic in Germany: 31,300 new corona infections reported Disaster in Turkey: Nine corona patients die in a fire in the intensive care unit
Gniffke and Frey explained the criteria for journalistic work and contradicted allegations that their colleagues would report from above according to specifications. Frey said that one should not only talk about individual reports, but also about the tone that “parts of your party use to the press”: “That is one of the problems.” Gniffke criticized attacks by Pegida supporters on journalists.
In the words of the Dresden AfD district leader Reinhard Günzel, the AfD wanted to make a “contribution to the culture of debate” with the event. It is important to distinguish between right-wing and right-wing extremists. Otherwise, people who subscribe to the Basic Law will feel excluded from the debate. Frey urged the AfD to clarify its own relationship with right-wing extremists: “You have to decide who to march with.”
Brussels (dpa) – Sleep an hour longer, more light in the morning, but an earlier sunset: In the night from Saturday to Sunday (October 27th / 28th) the clock is put back one hour again.
T-Online.de/TV
German nursing home becomes a hit online
Macron reports from quarantine with a video message
MPs reckon with sexism in the Bundestag
This building is way more famous than it looks
Instagram star dies after cosmetic surgery
Elephant cow gives birth – reaction of the herd amazes
US Vice President Pence vaccinated against Corona
NASA mission enables a first look inside Mars
These rules apply to your fireworks in the garden
Spahn asks for patience when distributing the vaccine
Strange beer appearance in the US Parliament
Suddenly there is no stopping the minister
Container use due to Corona causes a stir
Towing service has a bad surprise
Winter weather causes chaos on the US east coast
It has been a ritual that has been common for decades – winter time applies in this country until the end of March.
